![]() |
|||||||||
| home | subscribe | contact us | advertise with us | feature editorial guidelines | research editorial guidelines | gcsaa.org | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| October 2006 |
|
||||||||
Ode to the muni
Editor’s note: In August, GCSAA launched its newest addition to the forums – Municipal Square, dedicated to the unique challenges faced at city, county, state or other government structures operating golf courses. The following are from the first few posts on the new forum. Let me be the first to thank GCSAA for creating this new forum for those of us employed at municipalities. There are often challenges that are unique to a municipal environment, and this forum can be a great tool for specifically addressing those needs. — Kerry Satterwhite, CGCS I echo your comments and thank GCSAA for creating this forum. Until I started with the city about 6 1⁄2 years ago, I never realized how unique some of the challenges would be. I’m looking forward to some great discussions in the months ahead. — Gary K. Carls, CGCS Mark Woodward had a few interesting articles written in Sports Illustrated about his operation at Torrey Pines and the joys of municipal politics. While the dollar figures were certainly different in Mark’s case, it was kind of fun to read the comments of the opponents and recognize many of my own members in those comments. This forum should be a big help to all in muni operations. — Tom Forsythe, Director of Golf In Florida, municipal courses are considered enterprise funds -— meaning our revenue must cover our expenses. Every dollar used at my course comes through the cash register. I am sure there is much that can be learned between “muni” courses and privately owned courses. After all, we have the cash register in common. — Scott Wahlin, CGCS In Stamford, Conn., I am considered an enterprise fund/self-sufficient. I have a five-member golf commission. I can make recommendations to the commission and we basically make decisions together. I then have to send a letter to the mayor detailing the rates. If he approves, he sends it to the park and rec committee of the board of representatives, who then schedules a public meeting to discuss these rates. Depending on the reaction, it goes back to park and rec, who then vote to approve or disapprove (they may amend based on the public meeting). If they approve, it goes to the full board of reps meeting. This can take two to three months to happen. Ouch! — Michael Sullivan At our facilities, we establish maximum fees in our budget submittal that can be charged by each facility based upon historical information and surveys of the local market. The parks and recreation department director has delegated authority to adjust the fees by season and golf market conditions up to the established maximum. This has given us all the flexibility we need. ... — Paul Connell, Contracts Manager
|
RECENT issues
|
||||||||