Forum Groups

 

Forums / Politics / Golfweek inside the ropes 1-13-12 issue

Golfweek inside the ropes 1-13-12 issue

12 posts
  1. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/21/2012 5:01 PM
    Sorry guys that I wasn't able to find cut and paste this story, and wasn't really sure where to post it. I thought about here in politics because it has been an issue we have debated some here, but I am also hoping to see a response from GCSAA who participated, either from our president or ceo or someone, if appropriate.

    Martin Kaufmann wrote a voices piece in Golf Week January 13, 2012 titled "A case of misplaced priorities in Washington"

    [quote">After Hurricane Katrina ravaged the Gulf Coast in 2005, federal legislation authorizing relief funds specifically excluded the golf industry from receiving any of the largesse. The indignity was heightened when Congress lumped golf in with massage parlors, tanning salons and liquor stores. In 2009, golf was denied a cut of the $787 billion stimulus package.

    Stung by not getting their share of the park, top industry executives organized the "We Are Golf" lobbying initiative in 2010 and hired the Podesta Group, a well-connected Washington lobbying firm. Since then, it has been hard to escape the notion that the golf industry is too preoccupied with winning favor in Washington.
    The latest evidence came last week when We Are Golf representatives appeared with Labor Secretary Hilda Solis to support Summer Jobs+, an Obama Administration initiative to address youth unemployment.

    To some extent, the initiative is a self-fulfilling prophecy; tens of thousands of businesses add entry-level employees each summer.

    But We Are Golf goes further, claiming that this summer the golf industry will add "tens of thousands" of paid positions.

    We Are Golf spokesman Dave Marin characterized the administration's proposal to business owners this way: "Instead of the five jobs you add in the summer, can you add six?" He said industry reaction was "enthusiastic."

    That's dubious, at best, Steve Friedlander, who is VP/golf at The Resort at Pelican Hill in Newport Coast, Calif., and has run some of the biggest golf resorts in the country, says, "Nobody is going to (add jobs) unless business warrants it. That would be irresponsible to your ownership."

    We Are Golf could better represent the industry by addressing legislation that drives down youth employment.

    One example: From July 2007 to July 2009, the federal minimum wage rose from $5.15 to $7.25. Put yourself in the position of a course owner who employs a lot of entry-level workers in the cart barn and on the maintenance crew, and is struggling to eek out a profit and avoid layoffs. That would include a majority of course owners. Suddenly, in the space of two years, their entry-level wages rose a staggering 41 percent.

    It's little wonder that during those two years, according to The Wall Street Journal, the number of U.S. teenagers with jobs fell 691,000.

    This past Labor Day, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the unemployment rate for youth ages 16 to 24 was 18.1 percent, twice the national average. Unemployment among black youth last summer reached an indefensible 46.5 percent.

    Rather than making hollow public-relations gestures to appease Washington, We Are Golf should redirect its focus to more fundamental problems confronting the industry.


    I am interested to see some comments, I have some mixed thoughts it. One there is why can't we play like all the big boys in business? We have provided the importance of the industry, and what's more how many golf courses are the mom and pops, the small businesses that politicians are so eager to defend. And then my other issue is Mr. Kaufmann seems to pick on the people who are probably the backbone of our industry, those making minimum wage, (which I have already posted my thoughts on in another post), when in reality (maybe) isn't the biggest issue? There are a bunch of states who's minimum wages are higher then the federal governments. When talking about statistics of un-employed teens are tending to be more un-employed in my opinion due to the many full-time jobs that have been lost, employers are filling those part-time and summer positions with people who have more flexible schedules. The other thing I find funny is this from a magazine that writes about the professional golf tours and all purses and such, big money, (I know many charities benefit as well). But would sure like to hear others on Mr. Kaufmann's comments.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  2. Bollig Jeff
    Bollig Jeff avatar
    1/23/2012 11:01 AM
    Mel,

    Rhett Evans is travelling to BIGGA so he might not see this thread in an expeditious manner. He attended the summer jobs event in Washington, D.C. While the Golfweek article strayed to other issues, the session Rhett attended was focused solely on the creation of an online job database for youth to access in their job search. Golf was recognized as a traditionally strong provider of summer jobs. The message from the We Are Golf Coalition - GCSAA, PGA, NGCOA and CMAA was not to add jobs for the sake of adding jobs, but rather consider hiring additional youth for the summer only if it made business sense for the facility.

    Jeff Bollig
    Sr. Director of Communications
    GCSAA



  3. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/23/2012 2:01 PM
    Thanks Jeff,

    Sounds like Mr. Kaufmann was not quite aware of the purpose of the event.

    As I "stewed" over the weekend, when I would "reread" the letter, I did realize and think that there was really the meat of the letter, which I see as Mr. Kaufmann questioning the need of the "We Are Golf" group in lobbying, which I feel is relationship building, such as other lobbying groups do to support their industries and educate the elected official, we know they are not experts on all matters. I guess I am not sure if he was supporting the need for "We Are Golf" for lobbying or not?

    Then I felt Mr. Kaufman went on to make a political statement as I interpret it, about the federal minimum wage going up, a federal policy to which he feels is hurting golf, despite the fact there are many states with higher minimum wages and/or competitive wage issues which force business owners regardless of their business to pay more anyway. I guess I probably took a lot of offense, because I know how hard our employees work on the maintenance side and they are more then deserving more then minimum wage in my opinion for doing what we require them to do. I guess I felt there could have been many other suggestions or possible targets for Mr. Kaufmann in his political statement if that is what it was. I guess there is also frustration as well because Mr. Kaufmann really didn't offer a solution or a suggestion as to what "should" We Are Golf being doing for the industry?

    But maybe that is the purpose of a voices column, to make us think?

    Thanks, Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  4. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    1/24/2012 6:01 AM
    Mel tell me that was just a phrase you used "that I stewed all weekend".....please. That article after reading it did not mess up your weekend........have you in a tizzy to to speak. As I said to you many many post ago.......leave the TV alone, put down the Golfweek and do something productive........bust a mailbox, drink some beer.......get some tin foil and shades and watch solar flares. Life is way to short to be worrying about some guy giving his opinion, right or wrong.



  5. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/24/2012 8:01 AM
    Sorry Dave, yes it did, well except for those two hours watching FSU beat Duke and the play off games.

    I guess we all have our different passions.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  6. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/30/2012 7:01 PM
    Just to follow up, today I received my new Golf Week dated January 27,2012.

    In a letter to the editor, Mr. Joe Steranka PGA CEO, and the chairman of We Are Golf wrote a rebuttal. If you get a chance to read it, please do. He reminded Mr. Kaufmann the importance of the lobbying effort and the importance of the golf industry.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  7. Andy Jorgensen
    Andy Jorgensen avatar
    1 posts
    1/30/2012 8:01 PM
    C'mon Mel,

    You can't copy and paste the original article, then leave us hanging with a follow up rebuttal with no subscription to read it ourselves!!! Paste the rebuttal, man!!



  8. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/30/2012 9:01 PM
    Sorry Andy,

    I think their website stinks, unless I'm having a hard time surfing their site, I can't pull up any stories to cut and paste. I'll type out the letter like I did the original.

    Letters to the editor

    Support for We Are Golf

    "Martin Kaufmann was correct in citing that We Are Golf was formed two years ago in large part because the golf industry was excluded, along with casinos, massage parlors and liquor stores, from disaster tax-relief legislation in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. But he's out of bounds in referring to such relief as "largesse" (*A case of misplaced priorities in Washington.* Inside the ropes, Jan. 13)

    Largesse is defined as "liberality in bestowing gifts." Ask small-business owners or operators of courses devastated by a massive storm. If they consider tax-code provisions available to all other small businesses - provisions aimed at helping them get back on their feet in the wake of Mother Nature's wrath - if they consider this relief free-wheeling gift-giving.

    We Are Golf is making progress in securing such aid, and in changing misconceptions about our industry inside the Beltway. Our presence in the nation's capital - by paid counsel and our own officials - is delivering and reinforcing our messages regarding golf's positive economic, human and environmental contributions to our nation.

    There is nothing "hollow" about having the president and labor secretary publicly thank golf for its contributions to job creation."

    Joseph P. Steranka
    Chief Executive Officer, PGA of America
    Chairman, We Are Golf
    Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.


    Thanks Mr. Steranka

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  9. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    1/30/2012 10:01 PM
    I've read this thread a half dozen times. I guess I'm stupid because I just don't get it.

    1)Who's mad at who?
    2)Who actually would control the money that came into "We Are Golf" because it sounds hokey to me. Any oversight?
    3)Do private clubs get relief too? Really? Doesn't being private exempt them from having any sort of ground to stand on when asking for public funding (taxes ) to rebuild? In other words, it's like them saying, "you don't have money enough to belong here, but we'll sure as heck take it (taxes) to rebuild our stuff" Again, sounds sketchy.
    4)What am I supposed to be outraged by again?

    I really can't make out whats going on by the letters, Mel. Put it in a nutshell for me.



  10. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/31/2012 7:01 AM
    Steve,

    To answer your first question, I was mad at Mr. Kaufmann for questioning the lobbying efforts and picking a fight about minimum wage, I believe Mr. Steranka as the representative of We Are Golf was mad because their lobbying efforts were being questioned or because according to Mr. Kaufmann they were not fighting the issues that he felt they should be fighting? And Mr. Kaufmann was mad because he felt We Are Golf was not addressing as he felt his reason of minimum wage hurting golf's business owners. That is how I saw it anyway.

    I am not sure if private clubs would have access to money to help rebuild from a disaster, I can't answer that. I can tell you that municipal courses get some funds, we did during the clean-up from our ice storm of 2007, probably because it was listed as a city park. I don't think that is fair to our other courses in town.

    I don't know the agreement that exists between the associations on what each group puts in, if they do, or do they fund there expenses out of their regular budget? I'm sorry I can't answer that one either.

    But there are many small family owned courses that have been damaged, just like other businesses that had been damaged from natural disasters that receive federal money for repairing their businesses to get them going again, why not these golf courses as well? The economic engine that some of these courses might be for their small towns could be huge. That is what got the We Are Golf thing going as I see it. Why does golf get singled out to not get relief?

    Of course it helps us in other ways as well. We can lobby on other issues such as pesticide restrictions, asking them to use sound science as one example.

    I think the outrage comes not so much by Mr. Kaufmann's questioning the lobby effort, but what he thinks they are lobbying for? That is how I interpret it. And that's what came out of the nut I cracked. I would be interested in how others see it.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  11. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    1/31/2012 10:01 AM
    Ok Steve can you decipher that nutshell Mel put that in? If you do please forward the translation.



  12. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    1/31/2012 11:01 AM
    Mel has huge nuts.



View or change your forums profile here.