Forum Groups

 

Forums / Shop Talk / non stripping rollers on 3500

non stripping rollers on 3500

4 posts
  1. Kyle Fick
    Kyle Fick avatar
    4 posts
    3/20/2018 8:03 AM
    So a few years ago I asked and got responses on non stripping rear rollers for our 3500 sidewinders.

    Wanted to share my observation as well as ask others their opinion.

    This was a waste of time and money in my mind. There was a subtle reduced stripping event, but overall, not enough to where running these separate rollers made a difference. As far as trim work goes, the product around bunkers was reduced due to the "ball" end of the split rollers wanting to fall into the trap and mark more often. (the solid stripping rollers stayed above the lips, reduces scalping, etc.) The only time I felt these rollers were better was when we ground up plugs after aerifying. Less material would stick between the rear roller and the mulch kits when used together. But for this purpose, I devised my own roller out of a hardened steel rod and some HDPE rollers that one might find on a boat trailer. A little welding, and viola, we had a 2.5" rear roller for a whopping $20 to be used only when aerifying. My thoughts were that if the rollers wear down quickly, they can be replaced for like 7 bucks each season. Can't beat that.

    Anyway, I don't feel there was a value to these, but I'd love to hear other's comments. Thanks to those that read and post a reply.



  2. Jack Tripp
    Jack Tripp avatar
    3 posts
    3/20/2018 8:03 PM
    The reason for rear rollers that don't touch the ground all the way across were developed was not to eliminate striping. The rollers were developed to help with rear roller wash boarding.

    Do the new type rollers help prevent roller wash boarding at your course? I don't think they are perfect at preventing wash boarding, but leave less wash boarding than solid rear rollers.



  3. Kyle Fick
    Kyle Fick avatar
    4 posts
    3/21/2018 11:03 AM
    I didn't think there was any improved or noticeable difference. Maybe its our location or the fact we mow our roughs when they are dry, the HOC we've decided is best, Frequency of mowing, Turf type, or other factors that come into play. Bottom line in our experience here in Western ND, no real gain. I was simply looking to reduce the stripping effect with machines in our fleet to match the wide area lastec we use on primary rough locations. The benefits of a sidewinder for trim work are wonderful as we all know. On a side not to this primary reason for trying them out, it dawned on me that a HOC of 1 or higher, those rollers will continue to stripe anyhow. There's no way to prevent that roller to not be in contact with the turf in any regards, and probably at any HOC. These were sold to me by my salesman as non stripping, which I believe now he was misinformed.

    As I mentioned, I do like them when our mulching kits are installed. We seem to get less buildup between the deck and the roller this way and don't "Bind" the roller to prevent them from turning.

    In reality, Our old sidewinders don't move fast enough to cause any wash boarding anyhow. Having not known that was the development factor, I could understand the relevence for these rollers on a higher production mower in the lines of the 4500 or 4700 models. I'm sure there or others, but my knowledge isn't that developed.



  4. Roland McPhearson
    Roland McPhearson avatar
    9 posts
    3/22/2018 6:03 AM
    Which "non-striping" rollers did you try?



View or change your forums profile here.