Forum Groups

 

Forums / Politics / Taxes Next Year

Taxes Next Year

7 posts
  1. Sean Hoolehan
    Sean Hoolehan avatar
    0 posts
    10/3/2012 10:10 AM
    My local paper (East Oregonian) published this on the front page yesterday.
    Looks like more bad news for the US Economy.

    —A married couple with two children and
    an income of $100,000 would pay $7,935 in
    income taxes and $5,650 in payroll taxes
    this year, for a total federal tax burden of
    $13,585. Next year, they would face income
    taxes of $11,919 and payroll taxes of $7,650,
    for a total federal tax burden of $19,569, a
    total tax increase of $5,984.

    —A married couple with no children that
    makes $60,000 (each spouse earns $30,000)
    would pay $5,105 in federal income tax for
    2011. Their income taxes would rise to
    $6,308 next year and their payroll taxes
    would rise from $3,390 in 2011 to $4,590 in
    2012.

    —A married couple earning $200,000 (one
    spouse earns $150,000, the other $50,000)
    would see their income tax bill jump almost
    $6,000 (from $34,587 to $40,545) and their
    payroll taxes rise $3,258 ($9,742 to $13,000).

    —A married couple earning $1 million faces
    income taxes of $311,344 for this year. That
    would jump to $354,224 next year at a maximum rate of 39.6 percent. They would pay
    almost $4,500 more in payroll taxes.

    Sean



  2. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    10/3/2012 11:10 AM
    Saw a similar article on the evening news yesterday.......but thought it all BS as it was on the main stream media. Thought CBS, NBC or ABC had been hijacked by Fox



  3. Ashton Alan W
    Ashton Alan W avatar
    10/3/2012 11:10 AM
    I'm sure Congress will act on the "Fiscal Cliff" right after the election...



  4. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    10/3/2012 11:10 AM
    Alan Ashton said: I'm sure Congress will act on the "Fiscal Cliff" right after the election...


    Maybe a good reason to replace all of congress, they would get the message to get to work and get things fixed, although if they were all voted out, would they care? Probably, they would push it onto the next congress unless it would allow them to work together since they had no points to score or re-election to run for. Also since they don't have a president they have to try and make look bad either?

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  5. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    10/3/2012 11:10 AM
    This is likely to happen no matter who is elected president or into congress. This was passed as a temporary payroll tax holiday in order to stimulate the economy.



  6. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    10/3/2012 2:10 PM
    I generally have little concern for what others make and congratulate them for success when achieved. I do have a problem with politicians that leave office as millionaires. When you look at their salaries, they differ very little from the top paying jobs in our industry. My question is how do so many of these guys leave with so much unless they are getting something other than benefits they do not pay for. Harry Reid is a great example. He has pulled shady land deals that the rest of us have no inside information on. Bob Filner who left congress and is running for mayor of San Diego is also a millionaire a few times over. He had been in congress for ever, yet somehow came out pretty well on a congressman's salary. All these clowns made their money through mechanisms we have no access to yet think it is ok to tax the hell out of us, their bosses! I think I could believe we have a tax problem if an audit was performed on every politician and their staff as well as every cabinet position. When you can actually prove to me that taxing is short of what we need and that spending isn't inflated several times over, I will be willing to listen. Until a cut in government actually means you go from $100 to $90 dollars rather than calling a cut in the increase from $100 to $120 when you receive $110 instead and call it a massive cut, I will never believe we have a tax shortage! Show me reality in the budget and management process before you expect my wife and I to pay $1000 more per month in taxes. If these taxes were to go through, I would be better off retiring well before my planned time than to keep working. If you think the economy stinks now, just watch if this nightmare occurs.



  7. Steve Nelson
    Steve Nelson avatar
    0 posts
    10/3/2012 2:10 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: If these taxes were to go through, I would be better off retiring well before my planned time than to keep working.


    You shouldn't have said that Sandy, I can see the tech savvy flatbellies circling above East County all the way from here.



View or change your forums profile here.