Forum Groups

 

Forums / Talking it Over / President Obama's foreign policy

President Obama's foreign policy

19 posts
  1. Trevor Monreal
    Trevor Monreal avatar
    5 posts
    3/19/2014 6:03 PM
    Bash it all you want but remember...
    This tactic ended up working for Bugs Bunny:

    [img">http://i.imgur.com/ZuimyZT.gif[/img">



  2. Steven Huffstutler
    Steven Huffstutler avatar
    11 posts
    3/19/2014 7:03 PM
    Well, the chickenhawks don't like it.



  3. Keith Lamb
    Keith Lamb avatar
    3 posts
    3/19/2014 8:03 PM
    What do you suggest? Start a war with Russia? I agree that nobody has the right to take over a sovereign nation.....cough,Iraq,cough,Afghanistan,cough.... Diplomacy sucks cause it doesn't make people enough money.



  4. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    3/19/2014 9:03 PM
    Keith Lamb said: What do you suggest? Start a war with Russia? I agree that nobody has the right to take over a sovereign nation.....cough,Iraq,cough,Afghanistan,cough.... Diplomacy sucks cause it doesn't make people enough money.


    I actually think he's handling Crimea right. We have no business or interest there. As for Russia, Putin has Obama in a headlock giving him noogies while the rest of the world leaders are behind Obama and have him in a neck high wedgee.

    Obama is a blubbering idiot with foreign policy. Completely over his skis.



  5. Kenneth Rue
    Kenneth Rue avatar
    3 posts
    3/20/2014 5:03 AM
    and I have more respect for Bugsy and Yosemite Sam than Barry



  6. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    3/20/2014 9:03 AM
    Jon Stewart had a great take on this the other night.

    Showed VP Chaney criticizing the President on being weak and Russia invading under false pretences, which is the same thing we did in Iraq.

    Then he ran through a bunch of Fox news clips with them complaining about the President being weak, then followed it up with clips calling the President a dictator, king, etc. for his domestic agenda. So which is he?

    Putin's a nut job, and I don't think it would matter who was in the white house, Russia is a big player in energy now and those that are needing it, (Europe especially) are treading lightly. I have heard multinational corps in the US do not want the sanctions. So he is trying to balance that.

    It's a lot more complicated then we probably want to admit.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  7. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    3/20/2014 10:03 AM
    ...or we defend the guy regardless.



  8. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    3/20/2014 10:03 AM
    One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.



  9. Keith Lamb
    Keith Lamb avatar
    3 posts
    3/20/2014 12:03 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.



    Funny Sandy. :lol:



  10. Trevor Monreal
    Trevor Monreal avatar
    5 posts
    3/20/2014 1:03 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom.

    Yeah, well...that is part of it. We HAVE to say that.
    Unfortunately we lack the courage to be honest and say we are doing what we are doing to protect/preserve American interests abroad (oil, key trade routes, markets, etc.).
    Instead we have to come up with a more..."humanitarian" reason to make it politically palatable.
    For over 200 years (or 400 if you are in Jackson lee's district in TX) America has been a richly powerful nation...and it hasn't been because the government sends our troops in to spread peace and democracy.
    President Lincoln said,"At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher."
    I sense we are authoring up some self-destruction now...will we finish it?
    I don't know, I'm more worried about those black holes swallowing up airliners



  11. Curtis Nickerson
    Curtis Nickerson avatar
    0 posts
    3/20/2014 3:03 PM
    Hey Mel, after you were informed by Jon Stewart on the news of the world and double talk on fox, did he happen to play any clips of Obama and the health care double speak?



  12. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    3/20/2014 4:03 PM
    Curtis Nickerson said: Hey Mel, after you were informed by Jon Stewart on the news of the world and double talk on fox, did he happen to play any clips of Obama and the health care double speak?


    No that's old news, but I believe he did play some of that stuff back in the time. Jon takes advantage of double talk and hypocrisy on both sides. I just think Fox News provides the most material for him.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  13. Andrew Cross
    Andrew Cross avatar
    5 posts
    3/20/2014 7:03 PM
    Melvin Waldron, CGCS said: Jon Stewart had a great take on this the other night.

    Showed VP Chaney criticizing the President on being weak and Russia invading under false pretences, which is the same thing we did in Iraq.

    Then he ran through a bunch of Fox news clips with them complaining about the President being weak, then followed it up with clips calling the President a dictator, king, etc. for his domestic agenda. So which is he?

    Putin's a nut job, and I don't think it would matter who was in the white house, Russia is a big player in energy now and those that are needing it, (Europe especially) are treading lightly. I have heard multinational corps in the US do not want the sanctions. So he is trying to balance that.

    It's a lot more complicated then we probably want to admit.

    Mel


    Can't the president be both? Dictator's/Kings/ etc can also be weak on foreign policy. He is being overly heavy handed domestically (Obamacare failure among other scandals) and being "weak" with Russia. It's a known fact that he is over his head on a lot of the foreign policy. Not that I have the foggiest idea of the depth or scope of it.



  14. Steve Nelson
    Steve Nelson avatar
    0 posts
    3/21/2014 7:03 AM
    Keith Lamb said: What do you suggest? Start a war with Russia?


    Exactly. I don't care who is president we would be in the same boat. I actually think BO should just keep his mouth shut with the sanctions that won't do any good and just let them have crimea. We would do something similar in our hemisphere (without annexing it of course-see Panama & Grenada). Thank heaven Ukraine was never admitted into NATO.



  15. David Hebermehl
    David Hebermehl avatar
    0 posts
    3/21/2014 8:03 AM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.



    Thank you.



  16. Ronald Conard
    Ronald Conard avatar
    4 posts
    3/21/2014 8:03 AM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.


    I agree,

    signed

    Crazy Horse



  17. Larry Allan
    Larry Allan avatar
    0 posts
    3/21/2014 8:03 AM
    Keith Lamb said:
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.



    Funny Sandy. :lol:


    That strategy has certainly borne fruit Sandy



  18. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    3/21/2014 9:03 AM
    Larry Allan said:
    Keith Lamb said:
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: One thing you guys are missing. We never went into any country to take it over and stay! We have always gone it to hopefully free a country from tyrants and give them an opportunity for freedom. There is a big difference. When we leave support troops, they are not there to run that country. has it always worked, unfortunately not. Putin went in with the idea of taking it over.



    Funny Sandy. :lol:


    That strategy has certainly [u">borne[/u"> fruit Sandy


    There you go adding extra letters to words again.



  19. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    4/1/2014 11:04 AM
    CRAZY HORSE.


    I see what you did there.



View or change your forums profile here.