Forum Groups

 

Forums / Politics / Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!

30 posts
  1. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/18/2011 11:11 AM
    The jobs administration just did it again. How many did the administration lose in the Gulf of Mexico? Don't know but it was a pretty big number of high paying jobs. Lets see what jobs they have prevented the past couple of weeks. That would be 20,000 directly related to a pipeline from Canada and many more related to the pipeline and just today, probably 200,000 high paying jobs due to the EPA stopping permits in Ohio, related to hydraulic fracturing for oil shale. Fracturing will be studied for 6 more months. How many studies have already been done proving it safe? This administration has completely caved to every group that claims they are environmentalists in spite of scientific facts. Are they that ignorant about creating jobs or when you look at the green jobs cost of failure they are promoting, is there an alternative agenda? Why would you keep doing so many things to wrong when jobs and activating the economy are so important?



  2. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    Part of the debate as to why they don;t allow the pipeline is the additonal carbon footprint it will casuse as this oil is from shale and the refining process is condsiderably tougher. The Canadians will sell it to us, where we in fact do have the EPA standing watch or they can ship it to China where no one is watching nor do they care to watch.



  3. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    [img">http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll284/scottcgcs/02.jpg[/img">



  4. Kim Brock
    Kim Brock avatar
    3 posts
    11/22/2011 6:11 PM
    Scott,
    The Democrats had majority in both House and Senate first 2 years of Obama administration. How did that work out? Congress can only make the environment better for creating jobs. Neither side seem to get it. Kim Brock



  5. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/22/2011 7:11 PM
    kmbrk said: Scott,
    The Democrats had majority in both House and Senate first 2 years of Obama administration. How did that work out? Congress can only make the environment better for creating jobs. Neither side seem to get it. Kim Brock


    How did it work out! We got health care reform done and created more jobs in the private sector than the entire eight years of Bush 43. What planet are you from?



  6. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/23/2011 9:11 AM
    wahlins said:

    How did it work out! We got health care reform done and created more jobs in the private sector than the entire eight years of Bush 43. What planet are you from?


    I'l ltry to keep this brief, Scott.

    Although presidents don't create jobs (and have less influence over the US job market than leaders from a host of other countries), the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a net gain of 4.7 million jobs (seasonally-adjusted private and public sector) during the Bush Administration (this include millions of jobs lost from the 9/11 aftermath and the latest recession), while they report a net loss of 2.5 million jobs (seasonally-adjusted public and private sector) from the time Obama took office until October 31, 2011.

    For private sector jobs only, BLS reports a net loss of 653,000 for th eentirety of the Bush Administration, but a net loss of 3.4 million private sector jobs from the time Obama took office until Oct 31, 2011.

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not agree with you, Scott.



  7. Keith Fellenstein
    Keith Fellenstein avatar
    0 posts
    11/23/2011 10:11 AM
    Scott is from this planet but is living in an alternate reality.



  8. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/23/2011 1:11 PM
    kf00 said: Scott is from this planet but is living in an alternate reality.


    I guess it seems that way from both sides, Keith. You've got Ann saying your blacks are better than my blacks. I did not realize I owned a black.



  9. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/23/2011 1:11 PM
    jkauffm1 said:
    wahlins said:

    How did it work out! We got health care reform done and created more jobs in the private sector than the entire eight years of Bush 43. What planet are you from?


    I'l ltry to keep this brief, Scott.

    Although presidents don't create jobs (and have less influence over the US job market than leaders from a host of other countries), the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a net gain of 4.7 million jobs (seasonally-adjusted private and public sector) during the Bush Administration (this include millions of jobs lost from the 9/11 aftermath and the latest recession), while they report a net loss of 2.5 million jobs (seasonally-adjusted public and private sector) from the time Obama took office until October 31, 2011.

    For private sector jobs only, BLS reports a net loss of 653,000 for th eentirety of the Bush Administration, but a net loss of 3.4 million private sector jobs from the time Obama took office until Oct 31, 2011.

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not agree with you, Scott.


    The conservatives trashed this country and you cannot prevail. The poor fight the wars and they have the power. You can outsmart them for short periods, but they will eventually wake up. You're done.



  10. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/23/2011 1:11 PM
    wahlins said:

    The conservatives trashed this country and you cannot prevail. The poor fight the wars and they have the power. You can outsmart them for short periods, but they will eventually wake up. You're done.


    Huh???



  11. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/23/2011 1:11 PM
    jkauffm1 said:
    wahlins said:

    The conservatives trashed this country and you cannot prevail. The poor fight the wars and they have the power. You can outsmart them for short periods, but they will eventually wake up. You're done.


    Huh???


    The bottom dropped out before the current president was elected.



  12. Trevor Monreal
    Trevor Monreal avatar
    5 posts
    11/23/2011 6:11 PM
    I distinctly remember Democrats complaining during Bush's term that all the jobs created while he was in office were low paying and basically worthless.
    So, they should all be happy now. Those worthless jobs are all gone and some may never come back.
    Plus, you can now live, rent free (as long as you bring your own tent), in many of the larger cities in the US and A.
    God bless democracy.



  13. Kim Brock
    Kim Brock avatar
    3 posts
    11/23/2011 6:11 PM
    Scott,
    Sorry I do not have time to comment on your comment. I just blasted off to my home world. LOL



  14. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    11/24/2011 8:11 AM
    Obviously an angry and disappointed liberal.



  15. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/24/2011 8:11 AM
    I just heard a couple of days ago about another area of job prevention by the administration. I guess the Air Force has some planes out to bid. For no announced reason, the American firm was taken out of consideration and it was awarded to a Brazilian firm that also makes planes for Iran. It just so happens that the union that would have benefited from these new jobs did not endorse Obama in the last election. Could pay back be the reason for preventing creation of American jobs while creating jobs in Brazil? From what I understand, it wasn't an issue of construction costs. I have to ask why in the world when all conversation is on jobs and the economy, would you send jobs to another country. Between the Gulf drilling, the Canadian pipeline, the Ohio oil shale and now this, I wonder if this administration has a clue about economics or are they just trying to even up the playing field in some weird re-distribution way? Is this pay back to extreme environmental groups by sending all perceived pollution to other countries?



  16. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/24/2011 9:11 AM
    sandy1 said: I just heard a couple of days ago about another area of job prevention by the administration. I guess the Air Force has some planes out to bid. For no announced reason, the American firm was taken out of consideration and it was awarded to a Brazilian firm that also makes planes for Iran. It just so happens that the union that would have benefited from these new jobs did not endorse Obama in the last election. Could pay back be the reason for preventing creation of American jobs while creating jobs in Brazil? From what I understand, it wasn't an issue of construction costs. I have to ask why in the world when all conversation is on jobs and the economy, would you send jobs to another country. Between the Gulf drilling, the Canadian pipeline, the Ohio oil shale and now this, I wonder if this administration has a clue about economics or are they just trying to even up the playing field in some weird re-distribution way? Is this pay back to extreme environmental groups by sending all perceived pollution to other countries?


    Obviously an angry and disappointed conservative.



  17. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/25/2011 9:11 AM
    Scott, please tell me how someone voicing an opinion about jobs the current administration is preventing is either conservative or liberal. The act of preventing these jobs is beyond common sense. I would hold the same opinion no matter the party in power. It is job killing and it is stupid, not political. The Machinist Union was the losing group this time and they in fact did not support Obama's election. When all other factors are reasonably equal, again, no matter the party, that sounds like retribution.



  18. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/25/2011 9:11 AM
    sandy1 said: Scott, please tell me how someone voicing an opinion about jobs the current administration is preventing is either conservative or liberal. The act of preventing these jobs is beyond common sense. I would hold the same opinion no matter the party in power. It is job killing and it is stupid, not political. The Machinist Union was the losing group this time and they in fact did not support Obama's election. When all other factors are reasonably equal, again, no matter the party, that sounds like retribution.


    It is not happening Sandy. It is untrue. Fox News and all of the conservative pundits lie.



  19. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/25/2011 5:11 PM
    wahlins said:
    sandy1 said: Scott, please tell me how someone voicing an opinion about jobs the current administration is preventing is either conservative or liberal. The act of preventing these jobs is beyond common sense. I would hold the same opinion no matter the party in power. It is job killing and it is stupid, not political. The Machinist Union was the losing group this time and they in fact did not support Obama's election. When all other factors are reasonably equal, again, no matter the party, that sounds like retribution.


    It is not happening Sandy. It is untrue. Fox News and all of the conservative pundits lie.


    Here is a link from the Wichita (KS) Eagle newspaper:

    http://www.kansas.com/2011/11/18/2108059/hawker-beechcraft-said-air-force.html

    Hawker Beechcraft was one of two companies with the capability of producing the needed equipment, then the Obama Administration excluded Hawker Beechcraft from submitting a bid. Thus, they are awarding the contract to Embraer of Brazil without a bidding process.

    When Haliburton was the only company in the world that could serve military needs, liberals pitched a fit that they were awarded a no-bid contract. But, when two companies have the capabilities, the current administration denies the American company the opportunity to bid, without telling them why.

    If there's not the same amount of outrage here, then all the outrage was just petty politics to begin with.

    You can try to have it both ways, but you will be called out on it.

    Why the opposition to giving those jobs to Americans?



  20. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/25/2011 9:11 PM
    I would have to say I'm disappointed in this decision to not go with beechcraft.

    But isn't this government spending? Aren't they suppose to be cutting back? Of course the speaker and his minion Cantor want another engine for the F-35 that the pentagon doesn't want.

    It's all craziness.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  21. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    11/26/2011 6:11 AM
    Mel if the spending is not absolutely necessary I agree.....don't spend the money. But on the other hand if it is needed or previously budgeted to be spent then the American company should have gotten the work. I am tired of her "him" give a speech and rip American companies for going overseas when his administration is doing the same.........it is very adept at speaking out both sides of his mouth simultaneously.



  22. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/28/2011 9:11 AM
    I am not sure how Fox news lied when I didn't nor still haven't heard it from them! Did they lie about Fast and Furious, or voter fraud that is now being prosecuted or government over spending? I am not sure I have heard lies coming out of Fox. I have heard other than the dems party line but I wouldn't call those differing opinions lies.



  23. Wallace Jeffrey V
    Wallace Jeffrey V avatar
    11/28/2011 9:11 PM
    sandy1 said: I am not sure I have heard lies coming out of Fox.


    I just threw up in my mouth.



  24. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/28/2011 11:11 PM
    wallacej said:
    sandy1 said: I am not sure I have heard lies coming out of Fox.


    I just threw up in my mouth.


    The lies from Fox News are so obvious and so insane, discussing their reporting just furthers the insanity.



  25. Rodney Crow
    Rodney Crow avatar
    0 posts
    11/29/2011 7:11 AM
    [youtube">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5zmEZdHPW0[/youtube">

    This might cure all of our problems........



  26. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    11/29/2011 8:11 AM
    wahlins said:
    wallacej said:
    sandy1 said: I am not sure I have heard lies coming out of Fox.


    I just threw up in my mouth.


    The lies from Fox News are so obvious and so insane, discussing their reporting just furthers the insanity.


    Sure is funny for Fox News that they are on top in the ratings.



  27. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/29/2011 12:11 PM
    Jgansen said:
    wahlins said:
    wallacej said:
    sandy1 said: I am not sure I have heard lies coming out of Fox.


    I just threw up in my mouth.


    The lies from Fox News are so obvious and so insane, discussing their reporting just furthers the insanity.


    Sure is funny for Fox News that they are on top in the ratings.


    1. People slow down to look at car accidents too.
    2. I do not think those ratings include broadcast news.



  28. Kim Brock
    Kim Brock avatar
    3 posts
    11/29/2011 6:11 PM
    Scott, Nice to know that you have watched Fox News to hear such lies. MSNBC and major networks are always truthful? Yeah, Right. Hope you are having a nice day. KIM



  29. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    11/30/2011 7:11 AM
    I'm glad Scott is watching Fox also,do not have time to catch the news as perhaps I should but good to know Scott is watching for us.



  30. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/30/2011 2:11 PM
    [youtube">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TILIsFwPwYo[/youtube">



View or change your forums profile here.