Forum Groups

 

Forums / Politics / God speaks directly to Herman "The Ladies Man" Cain!

God speaks directly to Herman "The Ladies Man" Cain!

26 posts
  1. Steven Huffstutler
    Steven Huffstutler avatar
    11 posts
    11/12/2011 5:11 PM
    ATLANTA (AP) — Republican Herman Cain said God convinced him to enter the race for president, comparing himself to Moses: "'You've got the wrong man, Lord. Are you sure?'"

    The Georgia business executive played up his faith Saturday after battling sexual harassment allegations for two weeks, trying to shift the conversation to religion, an issue vital to conservative Republicans, especially in the South.

    In a speech Saturday to a national meeting of young Republicans, Cain said the Lord persuaded him after much prayer.

    "That's when I prayed and prayed and prayed. I'm a man of faith — I had to do a lot of praying for this one, more praying than I've ever done before in my life," Cain said. "And when I finally realized that it was God saying that this is what I needed to do, I was like Moses. 'You've got the wrong man, Lord. Are you sure?'"

    Once he made the decision, Cain said, he did not look back.

    Four women have now accused Cain of sexually harassing them when he led the National Restaurant Association more than a decade ago. Cain, who has denied wrongdoing, was silent about the allegations and did not take reporters' questions.

    Cain isn't the first to say God prodded him toward a campaign. Texas Gov. Rick Perry's wife, Anita, has said she felt God was speaking to her about the race, adding that her husband needed to see a "burning bush," a Biblical reference to God's first appearance to Moses.

    During his speech, Cain also criticized President Barack Obama for canceling the space shuttle program — a decision actually made by President George W. Bush — as NASA shifts its focus on travel farther from Earth's orbit.

    "I can tell you that as president of the United States, we are not going to bum a ride to outer space with Russia," Cain said to loud applause. "We're going to regain our rightful place in terms of technology, space technology."

    Cain was talking about U.S. plans, now that the space shuttle is retired, to use Russian rockets to send astronauts to the International Space Station. In the meantime, NASA is focused on explorations deeper in space.

    It was Bush who decided in 2004 to retire the space shuttle program. The Republican president still supported sending astronauts to the moon and Mars.

    Obama, once in office, dropped the goal of a moon mission. Instead, NASA has plans to build a giant rocket capable of sending astronauts to an asteroid and eventually Mars. It wants to outsource to private companies the task of ferrying astronauts and cargo to the space station — a job previously performed by the space shuttle.

    Until private companies are ready, NASA will keep buying seats on Russian Soyuz capsules to get astronauts to the space station. The cost per person to fly on a Soyuz is expected to rise from $56 million to $63 million, which is still cheaper than flying on the shuttle.

    Cain spoke in advance of a Republican debate Saturday in South Carolina focused on foreign policy.



  2. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    11/12/2011 5:11 PM
    [img">http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/Screenshot2011-11-12at55353PM.png[/img">



  3. Steven Huffstutler
    Steven Huffstutler avatar
    11 posts
    11/12/2011 6:11 PM
    [img">http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z133/Huffstutler/med_gallery_146_6_95273.jpg[/img">



  4. Wallace Jeffrey V
    Wallace Jeffrey V avatar
    11/12/2011 10:11 PM
    Steve,

    Don't be so hard on Cain. It was his lawyer, not Herman, that said this:

    ......any other women who might be considering coming forward with similar allegations "should think twice."

    That's not a threat....it's "advice". Legal fees can be expensive. He's just trying to save them money.

    And it was Rush, always the epitome of intelligence, that said this on his radio show:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcBXajhd7i4

    Seriously? How does this guy get ANY advertisers?

    Sorry, I still can't figure out how to post photos, let alone a YouTube video that won't take you away from this page. I'm trying.....



  5. Steven Huffstutler
    Steven Huffstutler avatar
    11 posts
    11/13/2011 4:11 AM
    Ask Scott, he knows how.



  6. Nowakowski Michael J
    Nowakowski Michael J avatar
    11/14/2011 11:11 AM
    Like Bill Maher said on his show, Perry, Bachman, and Cain were all told by God to run for president, so obviously God is screwing with two of them.



  7. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/14/2011 2:11 PM
    sylvansupe said: Like Bill Maher said on his show, Perry, Bachman, and Cain were all told by God to run for president, so obviously God is screwing with two of them.


    I think He is just setting Obama up for another four years.



  8. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/14/2011 3:11 PM
    [img">http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/ll284/scottcgcs/herman002.jpg[/img">



  9. Matthew Neff
    Matthew Neff avatar
    0 posts
    11/18/2011 8:11 PM
    Clearly, Cain is an idiot and the rest of the republican candidates are stooges...at best (and I'm even a republican - moderate but still republican). But I wish someone would explain to me why people go absolutely crazy when someone who invokes the name of God is exposed as a fraud. They eat it up. Seriously, what's so great about this? It happens all the time. Frankly, it's pretty played out by now. Why is anyone suprised anymore? And how does this lend any credibility to opposing points of view? There are hypocrites in this world especially in politics regardless of what side of the aisle they're on or what religous beliefs they have. For that matter, we're all probably hypocritical in some way. When these people are exposed it proves only that they suck and pretty much nothing else.



  10. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/18/2011 8:11 PM
    mneff4 said: Clearly, Cain is an idiot and the rest of the republican candidates are stooges...at best (and I'm even a republican - moderate but still republican). But I wish someone would explain to me why people go absolutely crazy when someone who invokes the name of God is exposed as a fraud. They eat it up. Seriously, what's so great about this? It happens all the time. Frankly, it's pretty played out by now. Why is anyone suprised anymore? And how does this lend any credibility to opposing points of view? There are hypocrites in this world especially in politics regardless of what side of the aisle they're on or what religous beliefs they have. For that matter, we're all probably hypocritical in some way. When these people are exposed it proves only that they suck and pretty much nothing else.


    I feel pretty sure that Herman Cain considers himself to be a Christian, so when it come to invoking the name of God I do not think that makes him a fraud. He is certainly not knowledgeable about the economy and international matters, and i feel he allows himself to be directed by the Koch Brothers, so I would never vote for him, but I would give him the respect due a man who has been successful in our society.



  11. Matthew Neff
    Matthew Neff avatar
    0 posts
    11/18/2011 8:11 PM
    I think it's pretty fair to call him a fraud in light of the allegations. When you repeatedly profess to be a Christian and then have multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, you're probably a fraud in my opinion. Everyone makes mistakes and if it was a one time deal then so be it - nobody's perfect. But I think it's fair to say that this appears to be more of a pattern of behavior than a one time mistake.



  12. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    11/19/2011 8:11 AM
    and there's this...what did Ann Coulter say about her "black's"?

    [youtube">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAGGpK7bSWc[/youtube">



  13. Matthew Neff
    Matthew Neff avatar
    0 posts
    11/20/2011 5:11 PM
    I love that video. I love the "OK...Libyaaa" after he's asked the question like he is taking a test - you know he's thinking "Dammit, totally forgot to go over this last night". He looked sorta like one of those kids in the that national spelling bee that is inexplicably broadcast on ESPN every year.



  14. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/20/2011 6:11 PM
    mneff4 said: I love that video. I love the "OK...Libyaaa" after he's asked the question like he is taking a test - you know he's thinking "Dammit, totally forgot to go over this last night". He looked sorta like one of those kids in the that national spelling bee that is inexplicably broadcast on ESPN every year.


    He is completely ignorant, just like everyone else on the right side of the political spectrum. It does not matter if you are a know-nothing, just look at who they ran for VP in the last election.



  15. McCallum David K
    McCallum David K avatar
    11/20/2011 8:11 PM
    Oh my mistake I thought you meant Biden but he is on your side.



  16. Matthew Neff
    Matthew Neff avatar
    0 posts
    11/20/2011 9:11 PM
    wahlins said:
    mneff4 said: I love that video. I love the "OK...Libyaaa" after he's asked the question like he is taking a test - you know he's thinking "Dammit, totally forgot to go over this last night". He looked sorta like one of those kids in the that national spelling bee that is inexplicably broadcast on ESPN every year.


    He is completely ignorant, just like everyone else on the right side of the political spectrum. It does not matter if you are a know-nothing, just look at who they ran for VP in the last election.


    That's a rather sweeping generalization. Not ALL conservatives are ignorant just like not ALL liberals are bleeding heart fans of reckless spending. Gotta agree with David though - Biden is a real piece of work.



  17. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
  18. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.



  19. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    jkauffm1 said: Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.


    I do not know Paul, but I do know that only fools believe in Republican Ideology. Tax the poor? Really? *shaking head*



  20. Ronald Conard
    Ronald Conard avatar
    4 posts
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    wahlins said:
    jkauffm1 said: Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.


    I do not know Paul, but I do know that only fools believe in Republican Ideology. Tax the poor? Really? *shaking head*


    Thanks for continuing to perpetuate the rift in our country.



  21. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    conard said:
    wahlins said:
    jkauffm1 said: Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.


    I do not know Paul, but I do know that only fools believe in Republican Ideology. Tax the poor? Really? *shaking head*


    Thanks for continuing to perpetuate the rift in our country.


    It is what it is, Ron. It is a war and once again the elite will lose. And they will make money (either way).



  22. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/21/2011 8:11 AM
    wahlins said:
    jkauffm1 said: Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.


    I do not know Paul, but I do know that only fools believe in Republican Ideology. Tax the poor? Really? *shaking head*


    Then, I might suggest that you read his papers, including the one I linked, and understand what he's saying. You'll find that his papers had a decidedly non-partisan, economic perspective (that many thought to beconservative, politically) from 1978 to 2003. Then, his papers lost their economic value and focused on liberal politics. A great example is what you linked, since he mischaracterizes "republican ideology" and proves he has no clear understanding of the economics behind it.

    To understand conservative economic ideology better, please read the following paper, titled "Supply-Side Policies and the Zero Lower Bound" by a trio of authors working at the University of Pennsylvania, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Duke University, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta:

    http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/publications/working-papers/2011/wp11-47.pdf

    This paper talks about how supply-side policies (conservative ideology) boost aggregate demand (what liberals are lookign for) without the economic slow down that accompanies liberal ideology. Its also non-partisan, which is tough to find these days.

    The key to following this debate is to become knowledgeable about the subject. Then, you can call out the BSers on both sides (as I've done here before).



  23. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    11/21/2011 9:11 AM
    jkauffm1 said:
    wahlins said:
    jkauffm1 said: Scott, are you quoting the same Paul Krugman who wrote this piece advocating for sweat shop labor overseas in 1997:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html

    Just wondering if this fits your view of what Krugman stands for.


    I do not know Paul, but I do know that only fools believe in Republican Ideology. Tax the poor? Really? *shaking head*


    Then, I might suggest that you read his papers, including the one I linked, and understand what he's saying. You'll find that his papers had a decidedly non-partisan, economic perspective (that many thought to beconservative, politically) from 1978 to 2003. Then, his papers lost their economic value and focused on liberal politics. A great example is what you linked, since he mischaracterizes "republican ideology" and proves he has no clear understanding of the economics behind it.

    To understand conservative economic ideology better, please read the following paper, titled "Supply-Side Policies and the Zero Lower Bound" by a trio of authors working at the University of Pennsylvania, the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Duke University, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta:

    http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/publications/working-papers/2011/wp11-47.pdf

    This paper talks about how supply-side policies (conservative ideology) boost aggregate demand (what liberals are lookign for) without the economic slow down that accompanies liberal ideology. Its also non-partisan, which is tough to find these days.

    The key to following this debate is to become knowledgeable about the subject. Then, you can call out the BSers on both sides (as I've done here before).


    Your responses are too long. I do not have the patience for them.



  24. Ronald Conard
    Ronald Conard avatar
    4 posts
    11/21/2011 9:11 AM
    jkauffm1 said: Its also non-partisan, which is tough to find these days.

    The key to following this debate is to become knowledgeable about the subject. Then, you can call out the BSers on both sides (as I've done here before).



    See? With this mind set at least there is a chance at open dialogue, which in turn might lead to real solutions. But of course, it takes open mindedness, thinking, and discretion



  25. Kauffman John M
    Kauffman John M avatar
    11/21/2011 9:11 AM
    wahlins said:

    Your responses are too long. I do not have the patience for them.


    My bad.



  26. Keith Lamb
    Keith Lamb avatar
    3 posts
    11/21/2011 12:11 PM
    jkauffm1 said:
    wahlins said:

    Your responses are too long. I do not have the patience for them.


    My bad.



    I can read his responses quicker than I can watch one of the many videos you have posted.



View or change your forums profile here.