Forum Groups

 

Forums / Politics / OOOOPS!! Another thing in Obamacare

OOOOPS!! Another thing in Obamacare

54 posts
  1. Ronald Kirkman
    Ronald Kirkman avatar
    42 posts
    11/20/2013 1:11 PM
    Greetings to All:

    Heard on the news the past couple of nights - Of Course Fox News- Is there any other?

    Any insurance company that is losing money on Obamacare will be subsidized by the U.S. Government. This is a yearly event and it will not end after a year or two or three or whatever. It could cost Millions or Billions.

    Hopefully, the young people will sign up so they can take care of us old people like me!!!!

    Capt. Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA 02492



  2. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/20/2013 2:11 PM
    Ronald Kirkman said: Greetings to All:

    Heard on the news the past couple of nights - Of Course Fox News- Is there any other?

    Any insurance company that is losing money on Obamacare will be subsidized by the U.S. Government. This is a yearly event and it will not end after a year or two or three or whatever. It could cost Millions or Billions.

    Hopefully, the young people will sign up so they can take care of us old people like me!!!!

    Capt. Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA 02492


    Capt. The truth as I understand it is, that insurance would be subsidized for the first 3 years to help pay for those high risk people.

    The subsidies that will last for the foreseeable future would have been those below a certain level to obtain insurance and up to 90% to states to help fund Medicaid people.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  3. Trevor Monreal
    Trevor Monreal avatar
    5 posts
    11/20/2013 2:11 PM
    Ends after 3 years. No worries...what's a few more billions. Chances are in 3 years the ACA website will still not be functional. PLUS...by that time all of our identities will be stolen and used to open up fraudulent charge accounts. These accounts will be used to purchase big ticket items. In turn, this will stimulate the economy putting millions of Americans back to work.
    Holy Cow! Another win win.
    I can finally see how this is playing out



  4. Peter Bowman
    Peter Bowman avatar
    11 posts
    11/20/2013 7:11 PM
    Ronald Kirkman said: Greetings to All:


    .......Any insurance company that is losing money on Obamacare will be subsidized by the U.S. Government......

    Capt. Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA 02492


    It's a bailout.



  5. Timothy Walker
    Timothy Walker avatar
    0 posts
    11/20/2013 8:11 PM
    And don't forget about how much the increases will be in 2 years since the youth are skipping out on the insurance and the companies who foot the bill on the sick and elderly have to recoup those expenses and skyrocket premiums.

    That is unless the healthy and young sign up to foot the bills.

    Had a nuts and bolts rep stop in yesterday, he is currently uninsured. If he has medical problems guess what his collateral is, his house of 30 years....



  6. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/21/2013 10:11 AM
    Did anyone mention the fact that while Obama was out recently saying that employer provided plans would be able to be kept, his very own justice department arguing for HHS was clearly testifying that over 100 million employer plans will go in the dumper between 2013 and 2014. They knew this all along and lied so they could sell the program. Oh, by the way, they lied about the census figures just before the election stating that unemployment had suddenly dropped to 7.8% magically 2 weeks before the election! Seems I caught quite a bit of anger when I brought that up back then! Why would these figures be lies? They are provided by a government agency that is only responsible for providing data, they must be correct! This entire administration has been built on lies and the dems are in this up to their necks. When will the supporters take their blinders off?



  7. Kenneth Rue
    Kenneth Rue avatar
    3 posts
    11/21/2013 11:11 AM
    Sandy -
    how about the Yorkie (Baxter) that was signed up in Colorado? The guy used his pet's name as an answer to a security question and I'm so happy that he is enrolled.

    Kenneth Rue
    Kentucky



  8. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/21/2013 11:11 AM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS"]Did anyone mention the fact that while Obama was out recently saying that employer provided plans would be able to be kept, his very own justice department arguing for HHS was clearly testifying that over 100 million employer plans will go in the dumper between 2013 and 2014. They knew this all along and lied so they could sell the program. Oh, by the way, they lied about the census figures just before the election stating that unemployment had suddenly dropped to 7.8% magically 2 weeks before the election! Seems I caught quite a bit of anger when I brought that up back then! Why would these figures be lies? They are provided by a government agency that is only responsible for providing data, they must be correct! This entire administration has been built on lies and the dems are in this up to their necks. When will the supporters take their blinders off?[/quote]

    When to republicans stop their BS and try to take rights away from people as well. Let's see keep government small, but we can force ultrasounds on you. You can only marry members of the opposite sex, (I'm waiting to see if they target interracial marriages next, you know marriages that at one time were illegal). Make it more difficult to vote.... (not that I am totally against voter id's but some of their wordings in laws, or locations where "free" id's can be picked up, hours of locations, don't always make it easy for people needing id's, and when there have been few situations of voter fraud), purging of voting rolls, (especially those in Florida, purging of veterans). I think when things like that are addressed and people supporting the republicans "Take their blinders off" as well.

    Neither side is working for what's best for all Americans, they are concentrating on what makes their bases happy and gets them re-elected, not for things that should be of higher priorities.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  9. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/21/2013 12:11 PM
    Mel, you are referring to a few individual idiots that happen to open their mouths and taint the conservatives. The entire democrat party has gone nuts over the past 20+ years. You never hear a conservative talking head saying that someone should take a dump in someones mouth or saying that we want democrats or old people to die. Your party has slipped so far off the edge it is laughable if it didn't make you want to cry. Everyone tries to mock the tea party as extreme nut cases but all they want is limited government that isn't spending out of control, judges that don't create law based on social justice and basically a government that follows the constitution. Obama's administration has been the most intrusive in history so I don't think you can very well compare it to anything the conservatives have done. And don't think for a moment that any conservative wants anything but a free and honest election. They only want to restrict those that have no right to vote as in non citizens or convicted felons. Personally, I would be much stricter. I think only people smart enough to vote should do so. A simple test that is non biased requiring you to know a couple of supreme court justices, possibly your sitting senators and congress representative the vp and pres and not much more. If you don't know those no matter your color, age, religion, sex etc. then you are too stupid to vote.



  10. Ronald Kirkman
    Ronald Kirkman avatar
    42 posts
    11/21/2013 12:11 PM
    Mel,

    You are a hard core Democrat. You should remember, the Republicans had nothing to do with obamacare and don't change the subject. It was a back door deal before our new Republican Seanator, Scott Brown got into office. His vote would have stopped Obamacare. You can see just from the very liberal state of Massachusetts the voters voted in Scott Brown because all the states democrats did not want Obamacare. First time we had a Republican Senator since I don't know when. Yes, he lost the last election to Elizabeth Warren who has done nothing for MA. She is a Bull Shi**er.

    You must face facts and realize Obama LIED and the DEMOCRATS LIED right along with the President. Now, don't forget the backdoor deal that Obama will give the big unions of there members not having to pay $63.00 for whatever but the suckers like me will have to pay for them. I think the figures are 12 billion the first year and 8 billion the second year and 5 billion the third year. (not sure of those prices).

    I know you will answer back but please stick to Obamacare, Big Unions and the LIES about how unemployment went down just before the election.

    We know what the Republicans did years ago - that is old history- AND REMEMBER I met and shook hands with one of the great Presidents of our time, over 65 years ago and he was from your state. Mr. Harry Truman. I don't think he would be proud of the Democrats today.

    Capt.Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA



  11. Joel Fielder
    Joel Fielder avatar
    0 posts
    11/21/2013 2:11 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: Everyone tries to mock the tea party as extreme nut cases but all they want is limited government that isn't spending out of control, judges that don't create law based on social justice and basically a government that follows the constitution.

    I think only people smart enough to vote should do so. A simple test that is non biased requiring you to know a couple of supreme court justices, possibly your sitting senators and congress representative the vp and pres and not much more. If you don't know those no matter your color, age, religion, sex etc. then you are too stupid to vote.


    A little bit hypocritcal there.



  12. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    11/21/2013 2:11 PM
    Joel, I clearly stated it was my own personal opinion. Do you want someone that has no clue what is going on around them voting on things that impact your life or finances? I am much older than you and have probably a much more jaded opinion but it is just that, my opinion!



  13. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/21/2013 3:11 PM
    Ronald Kirkman said: Mel,

    You are a hard core Democrat. You should remember, the Republicans had nothing to do with obamacare and don't change the subject. It was a back door deal before our new Republican Seanator, Scott Brown got into office. His vote would have stopped Obamacare. You can see just from the very liberal state of Massachusetts the voters voted in Scott Brown because all the states democrats did not want Obamacare. First time we had a Republican Senator since I don't know when. Yes, he lost the last election to Elizabeth Warren who has done nothing for MA. She is a Bull Shi**er.

    You must face facts and realize Obama LIED and the DEMOCRATS LIED right along with the President. Now, don't forget the backdoor deal that Obama will give the big unions of there members not having to pay $63.00 for whatever but the suckers like me will have to pay for them. I think the figures are 12 billion the first year and 8 billion the second year and 5 billion the third year. (not sure of those prices).

    I know you will answer back but please stick to Obamacare, Big Unions and the LIES about how unemployment went down just before the election.

    We know what the Republicans did years ago - that is old history- AND REMEMBER I met and shook hands with one of the great Presidents of our time, over 65 years ago and he was from your state. Mr. Harry Truman. I don't think he would be proud of the Democrats today.

    Capt.Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA


    Capt. I might be, but I do think I try to be more moderate, but that is my biased opinion of myself. I think you are correct on most democrats not wanting the ACA, since it's not single payer, but your Mass. delegation probably helped get it through since in is pretty close as I understand it to what you all have in your state and it seems to be working pretty good. Dont forget that the ACA started out as a Republican idea from the Heritage Foundation, a right leaning think tank.

    As for Senator Warren, yes she probably is a BSer, hey she is a politician.

    I don't know all the facts about what deals were cut with the unions, I'm not a fan of them, but neither am I a big fan of big business that takes advantage of their biggest asset and treats them like crap, (employees) if businesses treated people more fairly then they wouldn't need unions.

    Yes President Truman might not be proud of the Democrats of today and probably doesn't think highly of them, of course back in President Truman's day many southern that were Democrat are now Republicans, (I have told this story a hundred times, but when I lived in Florida and when I first registered to vote I registered Republican, because Nixon brought my dad and his fellow friends home from Vietnam, and since I liked Ford....but what do us 18 year olds know). I switched to the Democratic Party so I could vote in the primaries and vote on local races that I was missing out on. But as you make a statement about President Truman, I'm sure President Lincoln is thinking the same of his Republican party. Heck even President Reagan would have a tough time winning the Republican ticket. But like you said, forget what they did years ago, just look at what they are doing now.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  14. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/21/2013 3:11 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: Mel, you are referring to a few individual idiots that happen to open their mouths and taint the conservatives. The entire democrat party has gone nuts over the past 20+ years. You never hear a conservative talking head saying that someone should take a dump in someones mouth or saying that we want democrats or old people to die. Your party has slipped so far off the edge it is laughable if it didn't make you want to cry. Everyone tries to mock the tea party as extreme nut cases but all they want is limited government that isn't spending out of control, judges that don't create law based on social justice and basically a government that follows the constitution. Obama's administration has been the most intrusive in history so I don't think you can very well compare it to anything the conservatives have done. And don't think for a moment that any conservative wants anything but a free and honest election. They only want to restrict those that have no right to vote as in non citizens or convicted felons. Personally, I would be much stricter. I think only people smart enough to vote should do so. A simple test that is non biased requiring you to know a couple of supreme court justices, possibly your sitting senators and congress representative the vp and pres and not much more. If you don't know those no matter your color, age, religion, sex etc. then you are too stupid to vote.


    Sandy, I might not have heard some conservative talking head say those words, but I hear enough of them shout Socialist, Communist, Marxist, call for Revolution, Keep you hands off my guns, (which back in the 60's a than Gov. Reagan wanted to make hand guns very hard to obtain, and then after he had retired from office, backed the Brady Bill), Keep Govt. away from my Medicare and some of them use very disturbing language doing it. And those that are more moderate aren't doing enough to stop it.

    As far as President Obama's administration being the most intrusive? Well a huge majority of his intrusive programs were started under President Bush, no conservatives were complaining then. Heck the left was against them before he became President, and they don't support them now. I am willing to look at each program on its merit.

    I do think President Obama is moving a little more to the left in this second term, but when you see the programs he did introduce, like the ACA, that is built on an idea brought forward by conservatives. Look what he did for the banking industry, and business. He is more a centrist, why do you think he will take some heat from the left on some issues? It's just funny that conservatives don't champion ideas that the president took from them. They can't stand to see him succeed.

    You think conservatives want free and honest elections? They sure aren't free, and it was a conservative court that opened up the money spout on elections. How many districts have been gerrymandered at the state level with typically conservative legislatures? They don't want honest and free, they want to win to move forward their agenda. Follow the money paying for that agenda, and what do those people get from it. That's not to say it doesn't happen on the democratic side either. I think they are both wrong to spend that kind of money, just think what that money could do to feed and educate the less fortunate.

    As for a test to vote? OMG, what was our Revolution for? That is not how I see the Constitution that all men are created equal and should have an equal vote, (that includes the ladies as well). We already have the elite running the country because of their money. But that is your right to state your opinion. I do get disgusted with the voting apathy from both sides and we need to be doing a better job getting all people out to the polls, then it might be important to have stronger voter id laws.

    Of course all of what I mentioned above is large broad discussions and not really looking as close at each issue as it should be.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  15. Timothy Walker
    Timothy Walker avatar
    0 posts
    11/21/2013 4:11 PM
    Hey unemployment drops every time the benefits run out, these people disappear from the radar because they are no longer receiving benefits and not working, thus unemployment is reduced mathematically in the governments favor.



  16. Ronald Kirkman
    Ronald Kirkman avatar
    42 posts
    11/21/2013 6:11 PM
    Mel;

    Good come back on president Lincoln. I forgot about him. You are always one step ahead of me.

    Did they have Dems and Repubs in the days of George Washington? If not, when did the two party system actually start. And, why did it start.

    Capt. Kirk
    Retired Alien
    Needham Golf Club
    Needham, MA



  17. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    11/26/2013 8:11 AM
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/11/25/mark_halperin_obamacare_contains_death_panels.html

    Interesting piece on death panels. Starts at 8 minute mark. Did POTUS lie about death panels and rationing of health care to people who are near end of life or terminally ill? Someone may correct me, but wasn't it Marxism that considered the elderly, mentally ill, people who were chronically ill (ex. dialysis, heart disease, etc.) left to die because they were not contributing to the society therefore were a burden to the community as a whole?
    Sarah Palin was right on this. What is next?



  18. Ashton Alan W
    Ashton Alan W avatar
    11/27/2013 7:11 AM
    Jon Gansen said: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/11/25/mark_halperin_obamacare_contains_death_panels.html

    Interesting piece on death panels. Starts at 8 minute mark. Did POTUS lie about death panels and rationing of health care to people who are near end of life or terminally ill? Someone may correct me, but wasn't it Marxism that considered the elderly, mentally ill, people who were chronically ill (ex. dialysis, heart disease, etc.) left to die because they were not contributing to the society therefore were a burden to the community as a whole?
    Sarah Palin was right on this. What is next?


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/mark-halperin-death-panels_n_4344531.html



  19. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    11/27/2013 8:11 AM
    [quote">MALZBERG, HOST: A lot of people said you weren't going to be able to keep your health care, but also they focused on the death panels, which will be coming, call them what you will, rationing, is part of it...

    HALPERIN: No, I agree, and that's going to be a huge issue, and that's something else on which the president was not fully forthcoming and straightforward.
    MALZBERG: So, you believe there will be rationing, a.k.a. death panels?
    HALPERIN: It's built into the plan. It's not like a guess or like a judgment. That's going to be part of how costs are controlled.

    It is called backtracking. He clearly understands the question and gives his answer and continues to talk how the country needs to have a talk.[quote"> "We do need to do some of that in this country, because we can't afford to spend so much on end-of-life care. A very high percentage of our healthcare spending is for a very small number of people at the last stages of their life."

    Nothing out of context, nothing misunderstood. How do you define last stages, end of life. Do you argue age, the amount of healthcare you have used in your lifetime (will there be a limit?) Tell me how a man so sure of himself during the interview going into complete detail beyond the question can just say my bad just forget what I said?????



  20. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/27/2013 9:11 AM
    Jon,

    If I understand what I read in Alan's Huffington Post link, maybe Halperin from what it looks like doesn't know the ACA as well as he might have thought? (little box down in the corner, statement of:

    In fact, the Affordable Care Act does not include death panels.
    The law explicitly prohibits the Independent Payment Advisory Board -- which aims to control costs -- from rationing health care.



    What I did get from Mr. Halperin's interview was the "end of life care costs" currently and in the future might not be sustainable, especially in the current tax/fees climate? (my opinion)


    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  21. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/27/2013 10:11 AM
    Another thought,

    Depending on one's point of view or circumstance, insurance companies have been rationing health care for years. Through dropped polices when someone gets sick to denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. Of course technically people can still get care, but the question is, can anyone without insurance and these issues afford it. And I'm talking about years before the ACA.

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  22. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    11/27/2013 10:11 AM
    Mel
    Whats to say Halperin's view was correct? With all the lies( you can keep doctor, plan etc.) how do you begin to believe? Also I thought ins. companies were not allowed to drop coverage period prior to Ocare. I do understand pre existing conditions but if there will be death panels in the future what is to say it will become to expensive to keep the sick around. It will be the arm of the Gov. that people tend to trust that will make that decision.



  23. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    11/27/2013 12:11 PM
    Jon,

    You might be correct, I can't be sure of all rules prior to ACA, (and honestly can't be sure of rules now, but I think I have the basics down the very basics, maybe some of you might call them talking points).

    My understanding was that insurance companies did drop people up until at least the Portable Insurance Act was put into place. As long as you had insurance you would be able to get new insurance if you switched jobs or companies. Of course there were exceptions, a self funded plan could still deny on pre-existing conditions, (current employer used to do that for a year, now they do not deny even ahead of the ACA implementation). I also understood that insurance companies might not drop you, but would jack up rates so high, (which in one regard is understandable, how are they suppose to make the millions to pay their CEO's? Sorry, I try not to disparage someone who is successful, but just feels creepy to me, that they are making millions on someone else's misfortune), to cover peoples costs, that people would then have to drop insurance or get bare bones plans.

    As for Halperin, if it isn't true, then why repeat it and lie too, as so many of the right have, without looking for the truth. (Don't mean to bash the right.....well, yea I do, but the democrats aren't clean on this either).

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  24. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    12/4/2013 9:12 AM
    I just read that good old Harry has exempt most of his staff from Obamacare. Gee Harry, are they special or better than the rest of society you have chosen to punish?



  25. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    12/4/2013 12:12 PM
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: I just read that good old Harry has exempt most of his staff from Obamacare. Gee Harry, are they special or better than the rest of society you have chosen to punish?


    The only reason any of the congresspeople and their staffs have to use the exchange is because of Republican political games. Harry Reid and his personal staff will use the exchange (they are not exempt), but Congressman Reid (aka "good old Harry") can allow others on his payroll to avail themselves of federal health insurance benefits just like any other federal employee. I am going to guess that good old Sandy is exempt as long as he is working and his company provides insurance benefits. Prior to the ACA good old retired Scott could not buy insurance for any price and would have had to avail himself of a program Ronald Reagan established, an unfunded federal mandate that required hospital emergency rooms to treat me without compensation if I should make it there alive.



  26. Sandy Clark
    Sandy Clark avatar
    0 posts
    12/4/2013 3:12 PM
    I will have a decision to make in March when our open enrollment hits. If they jack up my current cost by some big amount as some have forecast, Medicare will become the choice. Of course I will have to check it again as well since the last time I compared was last March and it was comparable to my Barona coverage. When I find out how our company coverage is impacted, I will let everyone know.



  27. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    12/5/2013 8:12 AM
    Scott Wahlin, CGCS said:
    Sandy Clark, CGCS said: I just read that good old Harry has exempt most of his staff from Obamacare. Gee Harry, are they special or better than the rest of society you have chosen to punish?


    The only reason any of the congresspeople and their staffs have to use the exchange is because of Republican political games. Harry Reid and his personal staff will use the exchange (they are not exempt), but Congressman Reid (aka "good old Harry") can allow others on his payroll to avail themselves of federal health insurance benefits just like any other federal employee. I am going to guess that good old Sandy is exempt as long as he is working and his company provides insurance benefits. Prior to the ACA good old retired Scott could not buy insurance for any price and would have had to avail himself of a program Ronald Reagan established, an unfunded federal mandate that required hospital emergency rooms to treat me without compensation if I should make it there alive.


    Republican political games? Its political game playing that they have to use the same coverage as millions of other people? Or is it that Harold knows that this legislation is bad going to worse? Now we have POTUS that is frankly talking the part of a snake oil salesman advertising a product which is still very unstable, putting out ads with keg stands, telling bartenders to have happy hours and praise his policy. If healthy young people don't sign up where will the money come from.



  28. Wahlin Scott B
    Wahlin Scott B avatar
    12/5/2013 10:12 AM
    The Marketplace Fairness Act was brought by Republicans and subsequently supported by Democrats. The Republicans bluffed and the Democrats called them.

    Young people do not tend to make as much as older folks. They will receive subsidies and support the ACA. Not to mention the gamut of maladies and accidents that tend to occur to young people that older people do not get. The only better more efficient program than the ACA is actual government controlled single payer medical care; Medicaid and Medicare proves that.



  29. Jon Gansen
    Jon Gansen avatar
    1 posts
    12/5/2013 3:12 PM
    [quote">The only better more efficient program than the ACA is actual government controlled single payer medical care; Medicaid and Medicare proves that.

    Medicare and medicaid only proves how much more dependent we have become on our government. Well over 50% of the governments budget is entitlements.

    That is why this administration will fix as it goes along. Then when it is so screwed up we will hear all about single payer and how this will rectify all of our problems. Saved by the government once again.



  30. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    12/6/2013 7:12 AM
    I wonder if Obama, Pelosi, and Harry-boy wish they had read that healthcare bill before passing it? Probably not.

    The skeletons are falling out of the closet in droves. Now the doctors and hospitals are going to be left holding the bag.

    http://news.yahoo.com/obamacare-perilous-protection-plan-debtors-080000556.html



View or change your forums profile here.